Rh factor



Rh factor is also called "Rhesus factor" because it was first discovered in the blood of Rhesus monkeys (small monkeys from India often used for experimentation). Rh factor is an antigen, a substance which stimulates the production of antibodies to fight foreign invaders, such as viruses, bacteria and transplanted organs. A given individual either has the antigen already in their blood (they are Rh positive), or they don't (they are Rh negative). A patient's Rh status effects how he or she handles blood transfusions or organ transplants.

History

Prior to the twentieth century, blood and its function was poorly understood. In trying to solve the problem of serious blood loss from injuries, doctors tried to inject (transfuse) blood from another person or animal into the injured patient. In some cases, this worked and the patient recovered. In many more cases, however, the blood transfusion actually harmed the patient, often causing death. No one could predict which type of reaction would occur as a result of a blood transfusion. So, by the beginning of the nineteenth century, most European nations had outlawed the practice of blood transfusion.

About 1900 Austrian-American physician Karl Landsteiner (1868-1943) developed an explanation for the phenomenon of blood rejection. Landsteiner found that human blood serum (the liquid portion of blood surrounding the cells) could be divided into four categories, depending on its ability to cause clotting of red blood cells. He gave these groups the names A, B, AB, and 0 based on what type of clotting antigen they had, if any.

In 1940 Landsteiner discovered another of blood factor antigen, known as Rh. This discovery resulted from Landsteiner's studies with Rhesus monkeys. Landsteiner and his colleagues found that when blood from monkeys was injected into rabbits and guinea pigs, it clotted. This was because of the presence of another antigen that the researchers had not classified before. Landsteiner called this antigen the Rh (Rhesus) factor. Researchers also showed that the factor occurs among some, but not all, humans. It is also inherited.

Importance of Rh Factor

The Rh discovery had immediate practical importance because it explained a relatively common medical disorder known as erythroblastosis fetalis. In this condition, an Rh-negative woman who becomes pregnant with an Rh-positive fetus (an unborn child) sometimes develops anti-bodies against the Rh factor in the fetus. This development usually causes no problem during the woman's first pregnancy, since the number of anti-bodies produced tends to be small.

By the time a second pregnancy occurs, the situation has changed. The number of Rh antibodies produced by the mother's body has become large enough to cause destruction of red blood cells in the fetus. This can result in complications such as anemia (a chronic blood condition characterized by lack of energy), jaundice (a condition in which bile pigments build up in the blood and cause skin, eyeballs and urine to take on a sickly yellow tone) or premature birth. Today, this reaction can be controlled by immunizing Rh negative women after their first pregnancy with a drug known as RhoGam.



User Contributions:

synakk ak
Report this comment as inappropriate
Jan 23, 2010 @ 1:13 pm
Wouid you please inform me that 2RH positive parents can produce a RH negative baby ?Because my blood group is b+ and my wifes blood group is o+.But my childs blood group is B negative.What are the reasons behind it?Iam tottally confused.So would you please send its answer to my e-mail id-? My adress is synakkak@gmail.com.
Emma
Report this comment as inappropriate
Jun 12, 2010 @ 2:14 pm
Synnakk Ak: I think you can pass on the recessive gene for rhesus negative (weak rhesus negative), so one of you could have this. Or it could be that the results of your blood tests were wrong. I would either go to your doctor and get tested again, give blood and get tested there or buy a home test kit online and test your blood yourself.
Report this comment as inappropriate
Feb 21, 2011 @ 11:11 am
the presence of the rhesus factor in offspring is determined by the presence of this factor in the parents genotype.one of the parents' genotype must either be homozygous or heterozygous positive of this trait.if both parent are homozygous of this trait,then all their offspring would be rhesus positive but if one of the parent is heterozygous,all their offspring would be rhesus positive but genotypically they would be homozygous and heterozygous in the ratio 1:1. this shows that the rhesus factor is a dominant trait in man.
Report this comment as inappropriate
May 18, 2011 @ 12:12 pm
I was the first baby in the world to survive after a transfusion for the Rh factor. I'm trying to find a newspaper article from a Boston newspaper about my birth or my sister's birth, two years later. It would have been in 1945 or 1947.
Report this comment as inappropriate
May 25, 2011 @ 6:06 am
How can a knowledge of Rh factor help one in the choice of choosing a marriage pattiner
Report this comment as inappropriate
Jun 8, 2011 @ 5:17 pm
Pls does it mean that every Rh positive father can keep producing Rh positive child? And can this Rh factor be the reason why some couple after giving birth to their first child become unable to produce more children?
Di
Report this comment as inappropriate
Feb 7, 2012 @ 5:05 am
Rh negative mother and Rh negative father produced an Rh negative child. Mother required 2 units of blood to be transfused after the child's birth. Now the mother is pregnant with child 2. Midwife is recommending Rhlg injection at 28 and 32 weeks to protect the child because of the previous transfusion. Is this necessary or recommended when both parents are Rh neagtive?
Crystal
Report this comment as inappropriate
Mar 30, 2012 @ 2:14 pm
Question for anyone knowledgeable about the RH factor. It is a possiblity that since the RH factor was relatively misunderstood, or unknown prior to the 20th century, that it could impact one's family in the following way: My father is an only child, his father was an only child and his father was an only child. This represents roughly 86 years of only children in the family. Could it be that since the RH factor does not have a significant impact on the firtborn, but does on subsequent pregnancies, that the RH factor, or lack thereof, could have prevented subsequent children being successfully born into this family for three generations?
Report this comment as inappropriate
Aug 12, 2012 @ 2:02 am
My brother John, born 3/19/42 in San Francisco, CA @ U.C. Hospital on Parnasus Ave. was the first blue baby born that survived when a new wonder drug had been created but not used on a human yet. My mother was told that he would die but would have a 50/50 chance if she would agree to having a transfusion with this new wonder drug. He did survive & was told that they used this drug on all RH factor babies born after him. If there is a newspaper article on this, I would sure like to see it.
Ntombi
Report this comment as inappropriate
Aug 17, 2012 @ 3:15 pm
Im 22 weeks pregnant and only found out that im RH negative,this is my fourth pregnancy but i have had two miscarages after my 13 year old child and never got the rhogam shots.Can my situation be controlled now?im stressing and scared.
stephanie
Report this comment as inappropriate
Nov 10, 2012 @ 5:05 am
I was born in Oct. 1945 and the product of RH factor parents. I was told later that I was one of the first in the US to have been totally transfused at birth. My parents had a son 2 years earlier who only lived 3 days. There was an article in the Seattle Times when I turned 2 years old which stated that my transfusions at birth had changed some of the ways the Seattle Blood did their business, but am unaware what those procudures entailed. I had total transfusions at birth and then about 2 months later was taken to Seattle Childrens Hospital for more transfusions. There appears to be no circumstantial problems after that physically. I do tend to become anemic, but I weigh about 102 pounds and that is probably a contributing factor more than the birth situation. I had no problems in 1968 or 1974 when I had my two sons. I did have substanial bleeding and actually died after the birth of my first son, however, was told this was an anomaly rather than RH. I was not told of my RH factor problems until well after the birth of my sons. To anyone who does have this problem, I would suggest speaking to a blood bank or contacting a University who can probably explain it if your doctor cannot answer you properly ( and then I would change doctors). Best wishes.
Jeanine jones
Report this comment as inappropriate
Nov 11, 2012 @ 8:20 pm
If a mothers O positive and dads Apositive can they have a baby the O negative with the rh factor. Does one have to have the rh factor in order to have an rh factor child?
bia
Report this comment as inappropriate
Nov 17, 2012 @ 7:07 am
yup they have a baby with o negative blood group when mother and father both are hetrozygous for O positive and A positive and certainly hetrozygous for Rh factor.there are 25% chances of this type of gametes.

Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Rh Factor forum